Amy Wax, “Racist” Law Professor at Penn Law, Worryingly Says America “Better Off with Fewer Asians”
A controversial law professor at the University of Pennsylvania is once again inflamed for her racist comments.
This time, Amy Wax was accused of being xenophobic in a recent interview with Glenn Loury, professor of social science at Brown University, and was quick to applaud her critics. But her “defense” only made matters worse, when she said directly that because “most” Asian Americans supported Democrats, “the United States is doing better with less money. Asians and less Asian immigration “.
The social media reaction was swift, with former President Donald Trump’s niece Marie trump even ring.
“It helps to explain the situation in which this country finds itself in which an Ivy League university allows moral and intellectual bankrupt racist #AmyWax to teach the next generation of American lawyers.” There should be consequences for this kind of hate rhetoric @pennlaw, âshe wrote.
Penn Law School dean Theodore Ruger addressed the controversy in a statement Monday, calling Wax’s comments “anti-intellectual” and “racist.”
“Like all racist generalizations, Wax’s recent comments do harm by perpetuating stereotypes and imposing differential burdens on Asian students, faculty and staff to bear the brunt of this vitriol and prejudice,” he said. -he declares.
It all started with the December 20 episode of The Glenn Show, in which Wax discussed American immigration, insisting that it’s difficult to welcome people into Western societies if they don’t share. not the same values ââ- an idea she also shared in a recent speech.
âIt’s just more difficult to assimilate these people or to have confidence that our way of life will continue if we bring in a lot of people who don’t know it. These are not original ideas on the [political] right, âWax told Loury. âIt could lead to a change in the racial profile of those who enter. Obviously, we will have fewer people from Africa. We will have fewer people in parts of Asia, and it will be whiter – not a lot of white people want to come to the United States.
Specifically, Wax was referring to the South Asian elites migrating to the United States, which she differentiated from migrants from Latin America.
“[We] have to distinguish the mass immigration, which we get from Hispanics, south of the border, which I think poses different questions and challenges than the Asian elites we get, âshe said. âThat’s not to say that the influx of Asian elites is not a problem. I actually think it’s problematic. â¦ I think it’s because there is thisâ¦ danger of domination of an Asian elite in this country, and what does that mean? What will this mean to change the culture?
“Is the spirit of freedom beating in their chest?” She continued.
Wax considered the spirit of freedom to be “people who distrust centralized concentrations of authority who have a kind of ‘don’t step on me” attitude, who focus … on our freedoms, on our freedoms, small-scale personal responsibility that are mavericks in a good way.
The law professor noted that the idea of ââ’awakening’ is an elite ideology and that âAsians tend to be more in line with the mainstream ethic. “
Then Wax railed against the Indians who remain in America after complaining that the country is racist.
His comments did not bode well for the audience of Loury.
Loury posted an email he received from Auditor George Lee, who said he generally opposes undocumented immigration and generally agrees with Wax. But his last rant “disturbed” him.
âIt’s a bad thing for America to bring in immigrants who oppose America’s core values,â Lee said. “But … race and national origin are very poor indicators of the cultural values ââthat should be kept away from America.”
Lee elaborated on the Asian immigrants who made racial strides in America, “who hammered the curb and hit the airwaves to help stem the tides of racial essentialism and collective judgment in bills, voting initiatives and elections “.
âBy many accounts, Asians have been the main marginal contributors to some of these successes,â he said. âAsians contribute to the academic, technological and economic competitiveness of the United States, of which we all share the benefits. “
Wax then issued a rebuttal, saying Lee was “too optimistic about the influence of Asians and Asian immigrants.”
“In the case of Asians in the United States, the overwhelming majority vote Democratic,” Wax explained. âI find Asian support for these policies baffling, because I don’t see how they are in the best interests of Asians. We can speculate (and, yes, generalize) about Asians’ desire to please the elite.
“As long as most Asians support the Democrats and help advance their positions, I think the United States is doing better with fewer Asians and less Asian immigration,” she added.
Wax’s anti-Asian comments quickly went viral on social media.
Ongoing business Editor Nathan Robinson tweeted: “Amy Wax, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, who insisted she was not racist despite praising the superiority of ‘European’ culture, now maintains that states United need “less Asians” and we have to ask ourselves “how many Asians are too many. ‘”
âThe most ironic part is that Wax complains about the decline of ‘bourgeois values’, but then opposes the group of immigrants (Asians) who put him out of the question when it comes to these values ââ(academic success , entrepreneurship, focus on family, etc.) â, another Twitter user job.
Writer and Race Relations Specialist in History and Law Brando Simeo Starkey wrote: âI had the bad luck to have dinner with her in a group. She is absolutely racist.
In his statement, Dean Ruger said that while “Wax’s speech may be protected” it does not “allow this law school to ignore the real harm that this speech is causing.”
“Wax’s views are diametrically opposed to the policies and ethics of this institution,” he added. âThey serve as a persistent and tangible reminder that racism, sexism and xenophobia are not theoretical abstractions but are real and insidious beliefs in this country and in our building. This reality refines and deepens our commitment to supporting our community as we continue to work to advance equity and inclusion. “
The Washington Post reported that Wax had previously faced backlash for falsely claiming that black students in their classes were rarely among Penn’s most successful students.
âI don’t think I’ve ever seen a black student graduate in the first quarter of the class, and rarely, rarely, in the top half,â she said in a 2017 interview with Loury.
Due to Wax’s comments, Ruger said the professor would no longer teach compulsory classes but only teach elective classes.
âBlack students graduated top of the class at Penn Law,â Ruger said. “Contrary to any suggestion to the contrary, black students at Penn Law do extremely well, both inside and outside the classroom, in the workforce, and in their careers.”
In her last conversation with Loury, Wax claimed that former students of color were trying to get her fired.